ET1, C100, position statements, witness statements, consent orders and settlement agreements — reviewed and drafted by Eugene Pienaar, qualified solicitor. Fixed fee. Written feedback within 48 hours.
All fees fixed and agreed before work starts. Free 20-min scoping call first.
A qualified solicitor reviews your documents before they reach the court or tribunal. The gaps found at this stage cannot easily be fixed after filing.
Your ET1 is your claim form. Once submitted it is very difficult to amend. Eugene reviews the full document — identifying gaps in the legal basis, factual omissions, and compensation calculation errors — before you file.
The C100 sets the narrative for your entire family court case. Eugene reviews the completed form section by section and identifies anything that needs strengthening before filing.
A well-drafted position statement frames your case for the judge before the hearing begins. Eugene drafts position statements for family court hearings, employment tribunals and civil claims.
Witness statements in family and civil proceedings must comply with specific formal requirements. Eugene reviews and strengthens witness statements before they are filed.
A skeleton argument structures your legal submissions for the judge. Eugene drafts skeleton arguments for employment tribunal hearings, family court proceedings and civil claims.
Consent orders, settlement agreements and financial remedy documents reviewed by a qualified solicitor before you sign or submit. See the dedicated settlement agreement review page for full details.
Email your document to Eugene with a brief summary of your situation.
Eugene confirms the fixed fee before any work starts. No surprises.
Written feedback identifying specific gaps, weaknesses and recommended changes.
Follow-up questions on the feedback by email included in the fee.
The single most common reason litigants in person lose cases they should win is not that their legal position is wrong. It is that their documents fail to present that position effectively to the decision-maker. A judge reading a poorly structured ET1 or a C100 that buries the key facts will form an impression of your case before you have said a word.
Document review by a qualified solicitor is not proofreading. Eugene reviews the substance — the legal basis of the claim, the factual narrative, the specific arguments that will and will not work, the gaps that the other side will exploit. That analysis, provided in writing before you file, is worth significantly more than its cost.
The ET1 is your claim form. You cannot add new claims after it has been submitted — only the claims properly pleaded in the ET1 can be pursued at the hearing. If your ET1 fails to plead your unfair dismissal and discrimination claims correctly, the tribunal will only hear what you actually pleaded. Eugene's ET1 review identifies every gap before you file.
The C100 is the first document the court, CAFCASS and the other party see. How you frame the application in the C100 sets the initial narrative for your entire case. A C100 that fails to adequately explain the urgency, that gets the MIAM section wrong, or that does not clearly articulate the welfare concerns, starts your case on the back foot.
Many litigants in person arrive at hearings without a position statement. Those who do provide one often produce a document that runs to many pages but buries the key points in narrative. A well-drafted position statement is concise, structured around the specific orders being sought, and tells the judge exactly what you want and why you are entitled to it.
Email your document and Eugene will confirm the fixed fee before starting. Written feedback within 48 hours.
Send Your Document